On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked that in his recent policy speech on China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, it is an international order based on American rules, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family law and rules”. Last week, my colleagues responded to the content of his speech. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States Komiks has no fear of the international order based on the Charter of the United Nations and international law. The United States has been founded for 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has launched wars or carried out military operations under the name of “counter-terrorism”, resulting in more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, only Afghanistan,a href=”https://comicmov.com/”>BabaylanIraq, Syria and other victim countries have generated more than 20 million refugees.
Secondly, CinemaThe United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of Elimination of Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Immigration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-Future Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including “retreat and return, return and return”. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. BabaylanIn the United States, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I want to ask the US side to answer a few questions: When the United States launches war against sovereign countries and engages in a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadronsBabaylan system, in an attempt to build the Cinema version of NATO, which will disrupt the Asia-Pacific and undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation system. What are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of Cinema’s so-called “Democracy Summit” that divides the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the US does not enforce it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what is the rule?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States Cinema places domestic law over international lawBabaylan and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and the domestic economic and medical conditions are harsh, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the market competition principles and international economic and trade principles that the United States claims will only be abide by by the United States when they are favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, and believe in the United States first, and the American stick is waving in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land in other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintains the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. The facts Babaylan provedhref=”https://comicmov.com/”>Cinema and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.